WFS Home Page

Futurist_logo_yellow_72dpi.jpg (24529 bytes)
A magazine of forecasts, trends, and ideas about the future
July-August 2005 Vol. 39, No. 4

Contents of the Current Issue

Back Issues

Online Indexes:
Author Index A-L
Author Index M-Z
Index of News Articles

Reprints/ Permissions

Writer's Guidelines

Send a Letter to the Editor

Top 10 Forecasts From Outlook 2005 Report

World Trends & Forecasts

 


Economics

Demystifying Poverty
by Cindy Wagner

Breaking the poverty trap will require long-term thinking.

Democracy is often touted as a panacea for poverty: It promotes economic development, encourages innovation, and facilitates long-term investment. But there's more to economic development than democracy and free trade.

Since more than a billion of the world's people live in extreme poverty, economists and policy makers need to look more deeply at the factors contributing to wealth and poverty, argues political economist Romain Wacziarg of the Stanford Graduate School of Business.

Economic growth happens when there is an accumulation of resources, such as capital, labor, and technologies. Without these resources, an economy cannot grow. Poverty happens when a nation cannot accumulate these resources, so it is crucial to understand the reasons underlying this inability, Wacziarg explains. The suggestion that "democracy" or "free trade" can somehow solve poverty is overly simplistic, and not entirely accurate, he argues.

"Conventional wisdom is that democracy creates wealth, but this is hard to detect in the data because many autocracies such as Singapore and Chile have done quite well," Wacziarg notes. Despite being a dictatorship, Chile thrived during the 1970s while other countries faltered, largely due to its economic protections and incentives for business. "Democracy certainly does not hurt economic growth, but neither is it a panacea."

Free trade, on the other hand, does appear to be good for economic growth, as has been the case in India, where the annual growth rate increased by 1.5% after external reforms were applied in the 1990s. But growth (and prosperity) can still be thwarted in free markets. The key to unlocking the mysteries of poverty, Wacziarg believes, may be the factors producing a short-term vs. a long-term outlook throughout the society. And these factors may be more social and demographic than economic, political, or technological.

Impoverished countries tend to be those with high mortality rates (as well as high population growth). When people tend to die young, there may be little incentive to invest in business—individuals won't have the opportunity to reap the benefits of the investment, and businesses won't have the labor needed to fuel long-term growth. In Sierra Leone, for instance, a 15-year-old has a 57% chance of dying by age 60, so investment for a nonexistent long term doesn't seem to make sense, Wacziarg and co-authors note in a recent research paper.

And this lack of long-term investment suppresses economic growth, perpetuating the "poverty trap." Population growth continues to accelerate in these impoverished nations because children are viewed as insurance against high mortality rates, but this causes further economic strain on poor countries. "High adult mortality reduces economic growth by shortening time horizons," write Wacziarg and co-authors in the paper, "Death and Development."

"Higher adult mortality is associated with increased levels of risky behavior, higher fertility, and lower investment in physical and human capital. Furthermore, the feedback effect from economic prosperity to better health care implies that mortality could be the source of a poverty-trap."

Breaking out of that poverty trap requires a nation's institutions to adopt longer-term perspectives. For instance, Wacziarg's research suggests that protecting people's right to own land, machines, factories, and other resources creates incentives for investment and innovation. Such investment, in turn, creates the resources to provide health services that could lower mortality rates.

One byproduct of breaking out of the poverty trap could be freer societies, as "wealth seems to promote the proper conditions for democracy to develop," Wacziarg concludes.

Source: Stanford Graduate School of Business, News Service, 518 Memorial Way, Stanford University, Stanford, California 94305. Web site www.gsb.stanford.edu/news. See also "Death and Development" by Peter Lorentzen, John McMillan, and Romain Wacziarg (January 2005), available from www.stanford.edu/~wacziarg/downloads/death.pdf.

To order the print edition of the July-August  2005 issue of THE FUTURIST ($4.95 plus $3 postage and handling) or to become a member of the World Future Society ($45 per year).

Send comments about our web pages to: webmaster@wfs.org
COPYRIGHT © 2005 WORLD FUTURE SOCIETY, 7910 Woodmont Avenue, Suite 450, Bethesda, Maryland 20814. Tel. 301-656-8274. E-mail info@wfs.org. Web site http://www.wfs.org. All rights reserved.