Return to WFS Home Page

NOTICE: Essays and comments posted on World Future Society Web Forums are the intellectual property of the authors, who retain full responsibility for and rights to their content. For permission to publish, distribute copies, use excerpts, etc., please contact the author.

Cyber Society Forum

Methodology Forum

Opportunity Forum

Social Innovation Forum

Study of the Future

Wisdom Forum

World Future Society

Social Innovation Forum


4 Case Studies:
A Model for Virtual Schooling

SUMMARY: Over the past 10 years the education industry has come to recognize the value of online learning through virtual schools. The question remains, Which model of virtual schooling is most effective, and how can traditional institutions easily include the benefits of online learning in their existing programs? Over the past three years Intelligent Education, Inc., a fully accredited 9-12 virtual high school and curriculum content provider, has researched and developed such a model. Used effectively in a variety of settings, this model can easily be applied to any school wishing to enter the realm of online learning.

o.jpg (1352 bytes)ver the past 10 years the education industry has come to recognize the value of online learning through virtual schools. The question remains, "Which model of virtual schooling is most effective, and how can traditional institutions easily include the benefits of online learning in their existing programs?" Over the past three years Intelligent Education, Inc., a fully accredited 9-12 virtual high school and curriculum content provider, has researched and developed such a model. Used effectively in a variety of settings, this model can easily be applied to any school wishing to enter the realm of online learning.

The course curriculum for all the case studies was supplied entirely online by IEI (Intelligent Education, Inc.) and delivered via the eCollege learning management system. The course curriculum is constructed so that it incorporates the latest in curriculum development techniques. They are built around Gagne’s Instructional Events that prompt the necessary conditions for learning to occur, and Bloom’s Taxonomy to encourage learning on all 6 levels of thinking. Courses also focus on all three learning styles: visual, auditory and kinesthetic/tactile. Throughout the course, all six levels of Bloom’s Taxonomy and 3 different learning styles are built into each content item of every lesson.

Mosquero, New Mexico (NMVS) (Team-Teach Model)

Elements:

  • Scheduled online virtual class once a week.
  • Online virtual teacher who facilitated the course.
  • Onsite teacher/mentor who monitored the progress of the students.
  • All students were in the same classroom at the same time, each class period.

Results:

  • 100% participation and completion rate.
  • Average grade of 82%.

Benefits:

  • High integration of state-of-the art technology.
  • Highly interactive online activities to accompany traditional learning.
  • Skilled teacher was available for schools that do not have the necessary teaching staff but can offer mentors to monitor student progress.

In January of 2000, the state of New Mexico instituted the New Mexico Virtual High School. Mosquero High School, under the direction of Janice Green, participated in the NMVS who registered more than 600 students their first semester. Janice Green is a certificated teacher who acts as the onsite mentor and operates the school technology lab.

A master IEI online teacher, Amy Quirouet of Atlanta, GA led the course by meeting with the students on a weekly basis in the virtual classroom to facilitate questions, to review concepts and encourage student participation in group projects. Janice Green, a certificated Language Arts Teacher and the onsite mentor, was also online at the same time with the students who were all together in a classroom in Mosquero, NM. This enabled her to direct their attention to the necessary elements and to make certain they were on task, turning in their assignments on time. All assignments were submitted online, and Ms. Quirouet reviewed, graded, and posted grades, as well as made regular email contact with each student to make suggestions for improvements and to answer questions.

At the end of the 18-week course, the results of this team teaching were that 100% of the students completed the course with a passing grade. The average grade was 82%.

Elk Garden, West Virginia Virtual School (Team-Teach Model)

Elements:

  • Scheduled online virtual class twice a week for a total of 2 hours (block scheduling class).
  • Online virtual teacher who facilitated the course.
  • Onsite mentor who monitored the progress of the students.
  • All students were in the same classroom at the same time, each class period.

Results:

  • 100% participation and completion rate.
  • Average grade of 89%.

Benefits:

  • High integration of state-of-the art technology.
  • Highly interactive online activities to accompany traditional learning.
  • Skilled teacher available for schools that do not have the necessary teaching staff but can offer mentors to monitor student progress.

In February of 2001, Elk Garden High School in Elk Garden, West Virginia enrolled 6 students in Algebra 1 and 5 students in Pre-Algebra through Intelligent Education. Curriculum content was provided by Intelligent Education, Inc. and delivered via the eCollege infrastructure. The Algebra 1 course was taught and facilitated by Mr. Allan Jones, a Math teacher with a Master’s Degree in Education, of Intelligent Education in Atlanta, GA, and Pre-Algebra, by Mr. Michael Townsend, a college professor, and a master online teacher from Mississippi. Both classes were scheduled back-to-back so that one onsite mentor, Ms. Donna Lynn Lambka, could monitor each class in the school computer lab in Elk Garden.

Although Ms. Lambka was not a mathematics teacher, she was able to monitor and ensure the students were available for class and turned in their assignments on time. Mr. Jones and Mr. Townsend met with the students online twice a week (this was on block scheduling) to discuss course content, answer questions and encourage students to participate in conversation, group projects, and interactive discussion.

The end result was that the school was able to facilitate 2 additional courses for which they did not have the appropriate teaching staff. There was 100% participation and completion, and the average grade for the students was 89%.

Preston High School, Kingwood, West Virginia (Team-Teach Model)

Elements:

  • Scheduled online virtual class twice a week for a total of 2 hours (block scheduling class).
  • Online virtual German teacher who facilitated the course.
  • Onsite German teacher/mentor who monitored the progress of the students.
  • All students were in the same classroom at the same time, each class period.

Results:

  • 100% participation and completion rate.
  • Average grade of 86%.

Benefits:

  • High integration of state-of-the art technology.
  • Highly interactive online activities to accompany traditional learning.
  • Virtual discussion and language practice in German in the virtual classroom.
  • Skilled teacher available for schools that do not have the experienced teaching staff but can offer assistance in language practice and answering questions.
  • Onsite teacher was assisted in learning more about teaching advanced courses for her own area.

A class similar to that at Elk Garden, VA was held at Preston High School in Kingwood, West Virginia for German 1 and German 2 to a total of 21 students. The curriculum content was provided by Intelligent Education, Inc, via the eCollege infrastructure, and the students were taught online and facilitated by Mr. Michael Daily, a certificated and experienced German teacher, employed by IEI. The onsite mentor, Catherine Drown, was also a German teacher but felt unprepared to teach an upper level German course, and so had asked for assistance.

Mr. Daily was able to teach the course with the assistance of Ms. Drown who was onsite to assist in answering questions and work with the students in aural practice of the German language. Mr. Dailey also helped to arrange German pen pals and did a considerable amount of vocabulary and literature work that assisted Ms. Drown in preparing for future courses.

All discussions in the virtual classroom were done in the German language and the end result was a 100% participation rate and an average grade of 86%. The students were also able to move through the entire 2nd half of German 1 and the German 2 class with the aid of their online and onsite instructors, finishing by the end of the school year.

Birdville, Texas Virtual High School Pilot Project (Team-Teach Model)

Elements:

  • Scheduled online virtual class twice a week plus 2 hours of resource room/office hours.
  • Online/onsite virtual teacher who facilitated the course and mentored the onsite instructor.
  • Onsite teacher/mentor who monitored the progress of the students and taught the class.
  • All students met once face-to-face, and then online at the same time, each class period.

Results:

  • 83% participation and completion rate.
  • Average grade of 82%.

Benefits:

  • High integration of state-of-the art technology.
  • Highly interactive online activities to accompany traditional learning.
  • Skilled teacher was available for schools that do not have the necessary teaching staff but can offer mentors to monitor student progress.

During the Summer 2001 session, Birdville High School in Birdville, Texas enrolled 12 students in an Algebra 1 course. Seven of the students were completing the first half of the course, and 5 were completing the 2nd half of the course, which they had previously failed during the traditional school year.

The online curriculum content was provided by Intelligent Education, Inc., via the eCollege infrastructure, and the course taught by an onsite instructor, Ms. Ronda Schaeffer. Mrs. Schaeffer was paired with an experienced online instructor, Mr. Alan Jones of Intelligent Education.

All students were brought together one Thursday evening to receive their textbooks which had been ordered and shipped previously by Intelligent Education, Inc. The students and their parents were invited to meet the onsite instructor and at the same time arranged a conference phone call with IEI staff to answer technical questions over the telephone. Students were instructed how to log on to the website, and userids and passwords were distributed and tested to be certain students understood the logon procedure.

Students were also instructed as to the expectations and requirements for the course. They spent approximately one hour learning to navigate the course infrastructure. By the end of the evening they were comfortable with the orientation course, course requirements, and knew how to enter and meet in the virtual classroom.

The course met 3 days per week, for two hours each day, in the virtual classroom. Ms. Schaeffer led the discussion under the guidance of Mr. Jones, who was available in the virtual classroom to mentor Ms. Schaffer and the students.. An additional 4 hours per week of resource room time was available to the students to get questions answered. Ms. Schaeffer, new to online learning, became familiar with the infrastructure, and through Mr. Jones’ assistance was able to master the art of online teaching.

The end result of the 6-week session was an 83% completion rate (2 students had dropped out) with an average grade of 82%.

Typical Online Curriculum Delivery Methods:

After reviewing other online content provider methods and the manner in which courses are taught, there are a variety of virtual school models. These include:

  1. Level One "Black Box" approach
    1. Online Curriculum without textbooks. May or may not fulfill complete course requirements for accreditation purposes.
    2. Delivered in an asynchronous manner (no scheduled virtual chat).
    3. Without a teacher or mentor.
    4. Totally self-paced.
  2. Assignments turned in via regular mail, fax, email or computer aided grading.
    1. No real-time interaction with an online instructor.
    2. Typical results: 10-15% completion rate with a passing grade.
  3. Level Two Online Course
    1. Online lesson plans with correspondence materials sent out to the students. May or may not fulfill complete course requirements for accreditation purposes.
    2. Delivered in an asynchronous manner (no scheduled chat or real-time interaction with instructors or fellow students.)
    3. Online teacher who answers and grades questions via email.
    4. Self-paced within a certain time limit, such as 18 weeks to 1 year.
    5. Assignments turned in through email, regular mail or fax.
    6. Typical results: 20-35% completion rate with a passing grade
  4. Level Three Online Course
    1. Online lesson plans and limited online material with corresponding CD and hard copy materials sent to the students. May or may not fulfill complete course requirements for accreditation requirements.
    2. Online links used for reference.
    3. Delivered in an asynchronous manner (no scheduled chat or real-time interaction with instructors or fellow students.)
    4. Online instructors grade and answer questions via email.
    5. Students may or may not have mentors at the school level who are responsible for their progress.
    6. Self-paced within a certain time limit, such as 18 weeks to 1 year.
    7. Assignments turned in through computer aided grading, email, and by regular mail or fax.
    8. Typical results: 20-35% completion rate with a passing grade.
  5. Level Four Online Course
    1. Online lesson plans with all material presented online, no textbooks. May or may not fulfill full-content course requirements for accreditation purposes.
    2. Auxiliary links and activities provided online.
    3. Online teacher makes contact with student on a weekly basis through email or telephone. No scheduled online virtual class or chat.
    4. Students have a school or mentor who is responsible for them at the school level. (This may or may not be highly interactive.)
    5. Delivered in an asynchronous manner (no scheduled chat or real-time interaction with instructors or fellow students).
    6. Self-paced within a certain time limit, such as 18 weeks to 1 year.
    7. Assignments turned in through computer aided grading, email and by regular mail or fax.
    8. Typical results: 30-45% participation and completion rate.
  6. Level Five Online Course
    1. Online lessons plans accompanied by hard copy nationally accepted textbooks, resulting in full-content courses.
    2. Online auxiliary links and interactive activities provided online.
    3. Inclusion of current teaching, curriculum development and delivery methodologies consistent with current learning theory; such as using Gagne’s Instructional Events and Bloom’s Taxonomy, as well as emphasis on different learning styles.
    4. Online teacher makes contact with students in the virtual classroom for at least one hour per week at a pre-scheduled time, and through email and telephone contact.
    5. Scheduled Virtual Chat and student collaboration on group projects.
    6. Delivered in a combination of synchronous (virtual class) and asynchronous (threaded discussion and available 24/7) methods.
    7. Lessons are scheduled so that students have certain deadlines for when assignments should be turned in so they can meet course expectations; 18 weeks to 1 year.
    8. Students are assigned to a mentor who is onsite and responsible to make certain they participate in class and meet assignment deadlines.
    9. Assignments are turned in through computer aided grading, document sharing, email, whiteboard, regular mail, and fax.
    10. Typical results: 50-85% completion rate for students who log in anytime during the day, but not in the same place and time as fellow students.
    11. Students who meet together in the same onsite classroom with their onsite mentor, while meeting with the virtual instructor online, have an 85-100% completion rate.

In Conclusion: Recommended Model = Level 5

The following is a list of implementation strategies based upon lessons learned:

  1. Students must be counseled prior to registration. so that they are aware of expectations for their online course. This also guarantees they are registered in the correct course.
  2. If a group of students is registered through a particular school district, students, onsite instructors, and parents should meet together before the course begins to receive textbooks, login instructions, to meet instructors, and to go through the Orientation Course which will teach them to login and navigate the course. Instructors should discuss expectations for participation so that students are totally aware of grading policies and attendance requirements.
  3. Virtual class should be scheduled at a consistent time for all students to log in for content discussion, group collaboration, and assistance with content and technical issues. If possible, students should be allowed to use the school computer lab where technical assistance and supervision is provided.
  4. An onsite mentor should be available to answer technical questions, facilitate submission of assignments through fax (if necessary), and to monitor student progress in conjunction with the online instructor.
  5. Office hours or resource rooms should be available to students for additional homework assistance or to answer questions

For further information about course content, please contact:
Mr. Gregory Morse, CEO, Intelligent Education, Inc., Overlook III, Suite 1200, 2859 Paces Ferry Rd. Atlanta, GA 30339 (770)431-5100 dmuir@intelligented.com

Go to top of page
Comments? Questions? Critiques? Encouragement?
Send them here:

Your name
City and State
Country
E-mail address
Affiliation

 

Send comments to: webmaster@wfs.org
All contents copyright ©  World Future Society, 2002.
All rights reserved.