Futuring in Action
By Peter F. Eder
Two eye-opening incidents from my experience as a futurist in corporate
settings demonstrate the value of the strategic-foresight methodology described in Andy
Hines's article.
1. Mapping the System. In the early 1980s, I was responsible for
overseeing the marketing services activities of the GTE Corporation's 43 North American
and Western European businesses. I was assigned to prepare a format for long-term
forecasts (five to 10 years) in a way that would allow the plans to be compared.
It took about a year before we had a universal format, which resulted in
a binder typically close to a hundred pages in content. While the data, objectives, and
plans were comparable, the volume itself was challenging.
In a field visit to one of our operating entities, Unistrut Building
Systems, the CEO asked for a meeting. He took from his desktop folder a four-page summary
that he had one of his engineers create. It was a series of bar charts, curves, graphs,
and pictures that summarized the plan and laid out a crystal clear road map for the next
10 years.
In this instance, a picture was worth not just a thousand words, but
also tens of thousands of numbers.
2. Choosing the Right Forecasting Tools. During 1999 and 2000, I was
involved in an effort to research and forecast prospects for using interactive media for
telephone directory (Yellow and White Pages) advertising. The goal was to help the phone
companies' senior management and their publishing components to determine the needs and
opportunities to integrate online publishing.
I helped to construct primarily a two-element research test. The first
was a series of wide-ranging focus groups with consumers, businesses, publishers, and
telecom executives. The second was a Delphi study using about 50 well-known experts in the
fields of telecommunications and media.
While the end result was that the Delphi study built an intensive and
insightful picture of the coming decade, senior management was enthralled and distracted
by the focus groups. Despite continuous warnings of the hazards of drawing conclusions
from focus groups alone, the organization used participants' comments to affirm the
pre-opinions held by management. Time and again, managers viewed the focus-group
commentary as gospel.
Many of the Delphi study findings, which took longer to complete than
the "get it quick" focus group inputs, challenged or reinterpreted the
focus-group findings. In the end, the collective wisdom of the Delphi study members laid
out a much more credible and reasoned road-map, but it took considerable time to get
senior management's attention.
A lesson learned here was to keep the executive suite out of focus-group
viewing rooms.
Peter F. Eder is THE FUTURIST's contributing editor for Marketing
and Communications. He is an experienced marketing services executive at major U.S.
corporations and now leads Peter F. Eder & Associates, a marketing consulting
practice. His address is 7 Red Barn Road, Darien Connecticut 06820. E-mail
peterfeder@earthlink.net.