The Continuing Crisis of Capitalism - How Bad Will It Get?

Leaders from Bill Gates to the Pope are worried about the “Crisis of Capitalism,” yet defenders of the American system that almost brought down the world economy are digging in. Recent threats to shut down the Federal government rather than pass any form of tax increase, for instance, have the effect of taking money from the poor to protect the rich, who already own the bulk of the nation’s wealth.
This “revolt of the rich against the poor” highlights how extremely conservative our free market ideology has become – ironically, at a time when markets are failing. The US is entering its third market crash in a decade, leaving many to wonder, how bad will it get?
The nation has long struggled with a tension between the values of free markets, limited government, and self-reliance that comprise Republican ideals versus the need for community, cooperation, and social welfare that inspire Democrats. While this was manageable when the country was growing, it has erupted into warfare now that the economy is stalled.
To put the statistics on income distribution in perspective, the gap between rich and poor is among the biggest in the world, and it is eerily reminiscent of the gap that preceded the Great Crash of 1929. Today’s Great Recession drags on largely because the public has little to spend, causing stagnant market demand. Apart from the moral problem this poses for a largely Christian nation that professes to be Democratic, it now threatens survival of the system.
We used to justify this on the grounds that Capitalism was more productive, but the sorry state of our healthcare, research, infrastructure, public schools, crime, and other indicators no longer supports that claim. What’s worse, the dot.com bust of 2001, the banking crisis of 2008, and now the crash of 2011 – three crashes in a decade – tell us something is seriously wrong.
Liberals are complicit in creating this mess, of course. The Democrats are also dug in, protecting social benefits and a massive Federal bureaucracy that no longer make sense in a changing world. President Bill Clinton had it right a decade ago: “The era of big government is over.” VP Al Gore was making progress “reinventing government” but lost the presidential election to George Bush. The rest is history.
Today’s crisis is a moment of truth. The old American Dream of rugged individualism and lavish lifestyles no longer works in a globalizing economy facing climate change, ecological overload, peak oil, financial instability, and other mounting threats. The last thing the world needs now is more self-interest and lavish consumption, nor does it need more government bureaucracy. Yet Americans are locked in destructive conflict between left and right to avoid sacrificing these sacred cows.
This fight is not only contentious, it is so bitter that all energies are focused on beating the other party rather than finding solutions. The differences are not really great because compromises are entirely possible. But a ferocious grip on outmoded beliefs drives conflict in a knowledge-based world that requires collaborative problem-solving.
More daunting still is the fear that even tax reform, revising Social Security and Medicare, and other heroic goals – if they could be achieved – may not be enough to revive the Nation. As a management professor who has studied organizations during a long career, it is painfully clear that our present forms of big business and big government are badly outdated for a complex new world.
President Obama should convene a conference inviting corporate CEOs, government officials, labor leaders, and ordinary citizens to engage in a national strategic planning process. It should also be carried online with wide participation to fully address these challenges, plan for a more difficult future, and redefine the American Dream. For starters, Obama should appoint Al Gore as “Czar of Reinventing Government” and GE’s CEO, Jeff Immelt, as “Czar of Reinventing Business.”
Absent some such breakthrough, we can only look forward to more economic gridlock and political stalemate as the crisis mounts. Will all this intransigence cause business failures and unemployment to reach levels of the Great Depression? Could the left and center mobilize a counter-revolt to challenge the rich? Is it possible that the country could embrace opportunities to unify left and right into a more creative American synthesis? Or will we simply accept decline and learn to live with less?
Interesting times, indeed
William E. Halal, PhD, is a professor at George Washington University, Washington, DC, and president of TechCast LLC (www.TechCast.org). His recent book is Technology’s Promise: Expert Knowledge on the Transformation of Business and Society (Palgrave Macmillan)
- About WFS
- Resources
- Interact
- Build

Like us on Facebook
Comments
Great post.
Dear Bill,
Thank you for this post. There is little that any of us could find to disagree with. As an outsider looking in, what concerns me most is the increasing polarisation of American politics. It seems to be turning the US into a society that is inward-looking and xenophobic, which is everything that America isn't.
I'm not quite sure that I am fully with you for what you propose. I am of the view that the nation-state is starting to reach the end of it's shelf life, and that the key problems that we are now facing (climate change, global poverty, the regulation of commerce and finance) are global in their nature. This means that global - rather than national - solutions are needed.
I also feel that we ought to take a bit more personal responsibility for finding solutions. That we ought to ask ourselves how we can each do something different to improve our future, rather than rely upon others to make this future for us.
Perhaps this is something we might like take up? Let me start the ball rolling. Two years ago, I sold my car (I live in a small country town in England) as a way of reducing my carbon footprint. Would anyone else like to share ideas on what they have done and how I could do more?
With best wishes,
Stephen
Technological breakthroughs
Technological breakthroughs at the level we are experiencing are very disruptive, resulting in a race for natural resources, the impoverishment of the majority of the world population, a global recession and war. (Isn't this all too familiar; Think about the Industrial Revolution and World Wars I and II.)
At the same time, a new human species is emerging (homo sapiens robotic) that will eventually displace homo sapiens sapiens, just like homo sapiens displaced their less sophisticated predecessors. Good news for homo sapiens robotic, bad news for the rest of us!
Capitalism is not broken
Capitalism is not broken or outdated it is simply missing. Your comments are typical of an academic who sits in an ivory office thinking. You need to show a little respect for those of us who have spent our lives doing. I don't mind the opinion but I do mind the suggestion that idealistic systems of controlling human behavior will somehow be better for humanity.
Freedom my friend is the ability to wake up in the morning and become whatever kind of butterfly we choose to be. Every socialist system imagined by man takes away that freedom. Yes I understand that the early life of a butterfly is difficult and filled with struggle but when he or she appears complete the beauty is indescribable.
You my say that to many are lost in the attempt and that because of that we should have at the least a little help for those who need it. I agree with that but...well we all know what happens if you help to much. The butterfly dies or is deformed and is changed from its original purpose which is in our case to be whatever we want to be.
I do understand the proclivity toward "compassionate" systems. The problem is they are never compassionate. In the last century 100 million souls found an early death by murder as result of that compassion. In the popular but crude language of my neighbor "Screw that".
So the question is what do we do? I personally think that the rule of law with the freedom to produce something that others need and then trade it for something that I need is the cleanest and free-est system. Lets say that we add to this places where we can donate a portion of what we get for ourselves to those in need. We can call these places charities and they could be run by non-profit groups like churches and community volunteers.
Wait a minute that's capitalism and to quote my AA friends "it really works if you work it".
Sorry, but your blind faith is the problem.
Dear Ben:
Thanks for this passionate rejoinder, but I think you should get your facts straight:
1. I am hardly an "academic who sits in an ivory office." A quick search for my name will find www.Bill Halal.com -- Served as major in the US Air force, an aerospace engineer on the Apollo Program, a business manager in Silicon Valley, and now president of TechCast LLC (www.TechCast.org).
2. Why is any criticism of our economic system condemned as "socialism"? This article says nothing about socialism, and even makes a point of criticizing the liberal left. Economies differ widely around the world, and many perform better than the US.
Sorry, but I have to say that your blatant ideological faith nicely illustrates the problem noted in my piece. It is also a great irony that this blind conviction is the way Marxists spoke before the USSR collapsed. Please give this more thought. Bill
Greed
Great post reflecting a frightening truth. Being Canadian I sometimes feel a little insolated but our economic health is very tied to that of the US. We need our US neighbors to find a way out of this mess as well. I read a great book recently, FreeFall that goes deep into this subject and wrote this post: http://www.shift2future.com/2011/08/greed-economy-and-education.html reflecting on the topic and this post: http://www.shift2future.com/2010/11/education-for-automated-future.html talking about how technology/automation is accelerating the need for a new form of economy and a new definition of employment. We (globally) have some very serious problems to solve and a stalemate in the US only serves to make this worse. Even the "rich" depend on some good outcomes, eventually.
Brian Kuhn
Director of Technology and Chief Information Officer
Vancouver School Board
604 713-5000
my blog: http://www.shift2future.com
twitter: @bkuhn
Failure of capitalism??
"We used to justify this on the grounds that Capitalism was more productive, but the sorry state of our healthcare, research, infrastructure, public schools, crime, and other indicators no longer supports that claim."
Um, I couldn't help but notice, all those things you just listed are primarily funded & controlled by government, not the markets. The gov't is the single biggest purchaser of healthcare through the Medicare/Medicaid programs.
"President Obama should convene a conference inviting corporate CEOs, government officials, labor leaders, and ordinary citizens to engage in a national strategic planning process."
Don't we have enough ample examples throughout history of the ineffectiveness (at best) of top-down economic planning? I agree that "the system" is in need of a major overhaul, but the last thing we need is more of the same tinkering, band-aid fixes, market distortions and micromanagement.
Oh, and no more "czars" please. America is not a feudal serfdom...yet.
I agree that any economic,
I agree that any economic, especially capitalism, has a degree of selfishness to it. We all wake up in the morning and go to work because it does something to better our lives. Whether it be to put food on my table, buy a new car, or a personal satisfaction of doing good, we do have selfish tendencies. Capitalism is based on this but I feel all economic systems are based on this too.
It seems that the other economic choices have drawbacks that far outweigh any benefit they would have. Socialism/communism is a failure because a doctor does not want to make the same amount as a crossing guard. Capitalism is failing because it was discovered that politicians could easily be bought but we still blame capitalism. Maybe our problem here is that the politicians have more greed than any high powered CEO.
We dont need to blame capitalism as much as we need to blame our leaders who are so easily bought.
Post new comment