Utopias Forum

Visit Other Web Forums


A Proposal to Reorder Society
© James Concannon. 2003

NOTICE: Essays and comments posted on World Future Society Web Forums are the intellectual property of the authors, who retain full responsibility for and rights to their content. For permission to publish, distribute copies, use excerpts, etc., please contact the author.

Author's Notes:
One of the big frustrations of writers in the field of "Utopianism" is the inability to draw a sizeable audience to ideas that could really benefit society. But, lo and behold, here comes TV Mogul Rupert Murdoch to save the day! His new cable TV show, "American Candidate" will nominate a supposedly non-political outsider to run for the Presidency in 2004. Talk about an ideal platform to get the word out about ideas that have failed to reach the American mainstream! I suggest that the pot be stirred to find the best and the brightest in the Utopian field, and equip him or her with a practical plan for how the United States could convert to a Utopian society.

The proposal that I have been mulling over for several years includes variations on several ideas that have been proposed before, such as Dr. Prugovecki’s thoughts on using a centralized computer system to involve citizens in the governance of the country. The major point of my plan includes a gradual elimination of all forms of money in the 21st century through the use of a Constitutional Amendment, which would make the necessary changes law. This would dovetail nicely with the format of the new show, which would have the "candidates" squaring off in mock debates, so the idea could be vetted through other independents. Only one hundred candidates will make it onto the show from a pool of thousands that will fill out applications, so the platform has to be well thought out and presentable as something many American voters could support, and the candidate presenting the message equally appealing.

s.gif (1246 bytes)ociety should have no hunger, crime, homelessness, or need. The Declaration of Independence states that all men were created equal, therefore, all men should have an equal opportunity to thrive. Under the current capitalistic democracy, this is not possible. Therefore, this proposal lays out the framework of a new type of democracy, one that would allow all men, women, and children be provided their needs in exchange for their contributions to society. Opportunities to work would increase dramatically, and all members of society could find a way to make a unique contribution to society.

To accomplish this, the United States should:

1. Eliminate money in All Forms

ALL members of society can obtain free food, products, health care, transportation, and housing. There will no longer be any need for money, of either the paper or electronic variety. This will eliminate most forms of crime, which usually have money as their root cause. All citizens of the United States will be trained to take only what they need, and this message will be reinforced constantly to make hoarding an aberrant behavior. The final demise of money shall be instituted seventy years after ratification of the 28th Amendment, to give existing generations time to adapt or pass on from the only form of economics they could support.

Obtaining more of an item or an item of better quality, relates to a person’s lifestyle level, determined by the votes of society through a nationwide computerized tabulating system. The level of lifestyle for everyone will have an acceptable base amount of housing, food, medical care and other items required for survival that will never fall below a given level, no matter what the person does or does not contribute to society. Once all homelessness and poverty has been eliminated, than increases to all other levels of lifestyles can be made, with the goal of having the uppermost lifestyle levels being not much more comfortable than the lowest level. The ultimate goal is to have all physical goods, be they land or personal property, utilized in a manner that benefits every member of society, not just those who through the unpredictable circumstances of life have arrived at the top of the socio-economic strata.

Have all members of society become "evaluators" that will electronically "vote" on other individual’s contributions to society, so that accomplishments and achievements are rewarded by societal consensus, not by the vagaries of money. An individual may evaluate as many other members of society as he or she desires to, or as few, with more evaluations being done earning the evaluator more rewards. No names or descriptions of the person evaluated are part of the profile, so that a person’s age, race, or sex does not weigh against them. A person will stay at the same lifestyle level for a year, and be evaluated at the end of the year to determine whether his or her achievements for that year warrant an upgrade. Special achievements during the course of a year may be evaluated occasionally, so that a person may be rewarded timely.

All citizens will have a place to live, even if it is just a room with shared restrooms and eating facilities. A person’s evaluated status will determine what level of housing he or she is entitled to. Those who currently own homes will keep them, those who are paying a mortgage will be given the house. A national list will be made of all those who desire to move, and they will be matched with others with the same desire, and moves will be approved by elected "asset managers." Old housing stock will be razed (if requested by the owners) with the families that are currently in them to be housed temporarily while new housing is constructed. People from congested urban areas will be given the opportunity to start in new areas, away from the coasts, so that the country’s vast amounts of space can be better utilized. There will be committees that analyze every area of the country to determine its best usage, and new communities will be established in currently under-utilized space. This should help alleviate problems of overcrowding, which include crime, pollution, poverty, and despair. As the owners of houses pass on, the property will be assessed by the state to determine if there is a continuing need for it in the deceased’s family, or whether it could be better utilized by another member of society.

2. All People should be Employed.

All people will be strongly urged to work . Unemployment of any kind should be eliminated, with job trainers and counselors established to help the chronically unemployed. The committees, evaluators, and administrators described above will be considered jobs that are of benefit to society, and therefore will go towards maintaining and upgrading a person’s lifestyle if they are unable to work at anything else. There will be a tremendous need for these evaluators, as millions of profiles will have to be processed, which should lead to jobs for everyone. The new order will be based upon using the already existing work ethic, and providing jobs at all skill levels. In this manner, all people can become a contributing member of society, and gain the self-esteem that accrues from participating fully in a community. In order to accomplish this, society must:

Provide a complete education to everyone, starting as soon after birth as desired. All people will have complete access to as high and varied a level of education as they are capable of achieving. There should be branch campuses of the best schools in all fifty states. The attaining of advanced degrees or professional status in a trade will be evaluated, and will lead to substantial upgrades in lifestyle. There should be many more trade schools created to train people to build the increased amount of housing stock that will be required, as well as processing increased amounts of food, products, etc. The re-establishment of a manufacturing oriented middle class brought about by the Industrial Revolution should be a major goal for the new society, with self-sufficiency a desirable virtue inculcated in the young.

A person can work at the job that they are currently in, or switch as many times in a career as they choose, without loss of their current life style. Some will choose to stay, and they will provide stability, others will choose to change often, and they will provide new ideas and energy. In order to maintain safety and "corporate knowledge," experienced employees will receive higher sustenance, but job "shifters" will not have to worry about unemployment. The constant turnover will create the need for new inspectors, trainers, and administrators that will create more jobs. In this way, there will be a job available for everyone as soon as they are able to work. This will alleviate the problems caused when an individual stays in a job that they do not enjoy solely to maintain their standard of living, and the despair of unemployment.

There will be sufficient labor to produce all that society needs, so that those who currently do not directly produce products (i.e. lawyers, administrators) can continue to provide the services that they currently perform. With full employment, it is probable that the current workweek can be reduced, so that parents can spend more time with their families. Computer inventory programs will continually determine what goods are needed, so that manufacturing and agriculture can be devoted to produce what is necessary, instead of what is desired. People should be encouraged through land grants and other aid to take up farming, because in a country without money, food will be a valuable resource.

d. All geographical areas of the United States will be analyzed to determine their best use, and then existing communities will be given choices as to what industries that they may want to add. These choices will be based upon what products are currently needed and not produced in the United States, as with no need to continue to earn excessive profits, industries that went overseas can be brought back. All communities should try to become balanced, with some light industry, some heavy industry, administrative and professional services, agriculture, and homes.

3. Determination of Value

One of the most difficult transitions of this plan will be how a person enters into the new system. Basically, a person’s current position in society will be duplicated, with certain adjustments. People currently at low economic levels will be raised up to the base level of food, housing and education that they need in order to advance in society, so they will have all the tools they need to improve their lot in life. People whose current economic status in life is out of proportion with society’s reward system will have to divest themselves of assets over the course of several generations of their family. In order to accomplish this, society must:

Determine the value of everything that is produced in society, and whether valuable resources should continue to be used to produce that item. Responsible members of society shall vote on the value of each item by using a computer in each home, which shall be provided to them. For instance, fine restaurants will be rated on a scale from 1 to 10, with those rated 10 more accessible to high achievers, or those who save their lower rated restaurant credits to go there occasionally. When society has determined the value of all goods and services (a continual process), individuals will be able to choose amongst them based on their lifestyle level, with small consumable items having only minimal upper end personal quotas to avoid hoarding, and larger items ordered and their supply tracked.

A person’s contribution to society shall not be over or under valued, be he a neurosurgeon or a mentally disabled person. Those with high lifetime achievements will be rewarded by society with a lifestyle that reflects those achievements, but it will no longer be so ostentatious as to deprive others of basic necessities. Those who have difficulty achieving will still receive the minimum guaranteed level of sustenance to maintain their dignity and self-respect throughout their entire life, which should reduce the crime rate substantially.

The majority of the divestment of assets will occur naturally with the abolishment of money. The rest of the divestment will take place over an extended period of time, with small portions of land or other physical holdings being returned to society by several successive generations of the family holding the assets. As this entire plan is not made for actualization in its entirety until July 4, 2076, those who currently own the assets will not have to divest in their lifetime, but they will not be able to pass on vast land or monetary holdings. Everyone born into the society will start at the base level, and have to work up from there. There will no longer be inherited status, all lifetime possessions will have to be earned. The courts can assist in the divestment process, as it promises to be the most contentious.

A person will be given choices to select from that reflect their status when first entering the new society. There will be sufficient variety to allow each person to tailor his individual preferences, for instance, someone who prefers nice cars to fine foods can choose to have more and better selections in that category. But society will be encouraged to decide whether it still needs to produce ultra-luxury items if the base level of sustenance is not being provided. The choices will be separated into "needs" and "wants," with a person entitled to a complete needs package, and being rewarded with increasing wants as their lifetime achievements mount.

Everyone who is making contributions and achievements (no matter how small) will be given at least one week of vacation a year at a resort commensurate with their standing. As there are always some vacancies in some resort, people will be matched with available locations, and they will be entitled to take themselves and/or their family there. The value of the location will be determined by society, with base level resorts set aside for beginners, and more luxurious sites available to high achievers, or those who save vacation credits from lesser sites. It is important that increased opportunities for entertainment and relaxation be offered, in order to reduce the stress that leads to problems in our current society.

4. Politics and Government

As society has grown more complex, and the population has grown, situations have developed that could not have been foreseen by those crafting the Constitution. While the Founders of our nation developed a remarkably fair system of government, the system over time has become more responsive to those with the wealth to influence legislation. Many have come along and tried to make sure the system works fairly for all, regardless of their nationality, religion, or sex, but too often such efforts have been defeated or undermined. The gap between the wealthy and the poor in this country continues to grow, with many formerly middle class families moving towards the despair of poverty. The goal of government should be to ensure that as many citizens as possible end up within the normal distribution of a bell curve, with only small proportions at the high or low end.

The government is in charge of the finite pool of money that exists, but they are not in control of the growth of population, nor the distribution of resources. By removing the money, and creating the means for all citizens to have a voice in how resources are distributed, the government could guarantee each citizen the ability to pursue happiness, and become truly democratic. To do this, society should:

Reorganize the government agencies to become a facilitator of resource exchanges. While the three major branches of the government would remain the same, their authorities would change drastically. In a time when the access to communication has increased dramatically, there is no longer a need for representative government, every member of society can literally represent themselves. However, society is far too complex for the ordinary person to be voting all the time on issues that they either do not understand or do not care about. Therefore, the legislative body of the government will take on a more judicial model, in which subject matter experts will explain the pros and cons of an issue to a jury of citizens, who will then determine what shall become law. Every citizen will be required to serve on a law jury at least once a year, so there is a constant rotation of opinions and backgrounds determining the laws of the land.

Agencies that were hampered in their missions before by lack of funding could now move aggressively. For instance, HUD and GSA could become central clearing points for housing and office planning, and could create many administrative and construction trade job opportunities. Agriculture could oversee and enhance an enormous growth in the amount of farming. These agencies are currently organized and motivated to serve the public; their roles could be strengthened if unfettered by yearly budget restrictions.

Congressmen and Senators will be legislative specialists who write the initial drafts of the laws that shall be brought before the law tribunals. They will no longer have to seek contributions from special interest groups to be elected, and will therefore be able to concentrate on the needs of those who elect them. In this manner, society will be governed by laws that they approved themselves, rather than having one representative for hundreds of thousands of people. Each Congressman and Senator will serve just one four year term.

Be given an opportunity to voice their opinion on Presidential policies prior to them being enacted, but not be given direct approval of his decisions. All democracies must have a leader who is able to operate independently in national security situations, and this should not change. But the President should move towards becoming the implementers of society’s policies, rather than the creator of his own.

The government will control the information "superhighway" that will be needed in order to implement the plan. Confidentiality will be maintained to the highest degree possible, but it will be necessary for the government to know more information about each individual than it does currently. This is the price that must be paid in order to have all of society function at a more evolved and civilized manner. This disadvantage will be offset by increased security in having all people, including criminals, readily identifiable. Besides, the amount of "freedom" currently enjoyed by the population is greatly reduced by the amount of security and precautions that must be taken against crime.

The government will deal with the problems that will be created with foreign trade. Countries that currently have vast monetary holdings and investments will have to be compensated in either products, raw material, or gold. The amount that they will be compensated will be negotiated prior to the conversion, but in cases of dispute, the government will make a unilateral decision that may be appealed in court. The US government will attempt to determine what resources it has that best match the needs of their trading partner, but if no suitable match can be found, gold from US storage will be offered.

5. Business

One of the greatest adjustments that will have to be made is the one made by business. There will have to be a monumental shift from the capitalistic/profit motive to a more mutual beneficial mode of operations. The current model calls for mass layoffs of personnel to improve the bottom line; this plan will call for mass hiring, retraining, and accommodation of rapid turnover. One of the most important tasks that they will have to accomplish is the reintegration of production plants that have been sent overseas; to do this, society’s business’ must:

Attempt to bring back all business that was sent overseas to take advantage of lower costs to the United States. Full employment will never be accomplished if there are no businesses for people to work in, as is often currently the case. The new plants will be "seeded" into communities that are being started away from the major metropolitan areas; this will encourage the rebirth of small American towns.

Business will still be the place for those with strong material needs to exercise those urges, and their sustenance level will be tied to their company’s performance. The leaders and workers of a business will not be rewarded out of proportion with the rest of society, as society will still be determining their level. But as many of the products that best serve society are still created within companies by people with a strong desire for increased status and possessions, their continued existence should be encouraged and promoted.

Business will also be required to divest itself of certain property if it is determined that their holdings are in excess of what is necessary to produce their products. This will follow the generations pattern established for personal property, in that one third of excess property must be relinquished every twenty-five years. This is so that proper planning may take place, and the succeeding generations may be prepared for making do with less. The business shall submit its plan to the divestiture committee for approval, and in the case of disputes, the legal system may have to become involved. Divestiture should be as voluntary as possible, and a business should be given as much input as possible in what will be returned to society.

A business will be determined successful by their impact upon improving society, and how much they manage to contribute. As with all other segments, evaluators, which can consist of both regular voting members of society, and experts if a business is specialized, will determine their success and their direct impact on society if it is not readily apparent. Businesses deemed successful will be allotted greater shares of resources, and their employees will be awarded a greater personal life style. This will replace the profit motive, but will also offer ample incentive for innovation.

Wasteful competitiveness will be eliminated, as there will be no need to out-produce other suppliers. As an atmosphere of cooperation gradually takes hold, the businesses will start to produce more items that are needed, such as health care items, rather than unnecessary luxury items. Instead of each company trying to produce many different variations of the same product to suit individual tastes, they will be encouraged to produce more standard products so that everyone can have one. In this manner, resource allocation will take into account each firm’s strengths and weaknesses, and the base level of society can be continually improved.

6. Religion

One of the current strongest positions of the Constitution is "separation of church and state." Religion and faith will be extraordinarily important to an undertaking of this magnitude, as reliance on strangers and trust in others has to increase greatly. As modern religions are currently supported by the voluntary contributions of their supporters, there will have to be a mechanism by which religious institutions can continue to be supported. Society can do this by:

Having a vote of all to determine what level of resources are going to be allotted to religion. The average of everyone’s vote will determine what proportion of society’s assets will be devoted towards the continuance of all the religions. Once the asset pool has been determined, the pool shall be divided amongst the faiths in accordance with the proportion of people who indicate they are a member of the faith. For instance, if Catholics make up thirty-five percent of the entire pool of people who state they are a member of a religion, than they will be entitled to that share of the asset pool.

While the support of organized religion would now be through a governmental organization, the government would not have any voice in how the resources allocated were used. The members of the faith would continue to act as independent stewards of their denomination.

Conclusion
This proposal organizes in outline form a beginning point for discussion of a substantial reorganization of American society. It addresses the major institutions of our culture, and how they would have to change to accommodate the main point of the plan, which is the elimination of money. All factors of such a change could not (and should not) be covered in an initial outline such as this, but the groundwork for explanation and debate on the idea has been laid. Certain points are not as well developed as others as they are either too controversial to pursue in a proposal of limited scope (religion), or are so complex (foreign policy, business) that much more discussion will be necessary. The proposal is written in terms that allow for easy explanation to all members of society, especially the young, as this is a possible alternative to the world that they will inherit.

Motivation
The reason this proposal was written and put forth was the sense of the author that no matter how much society attempted to solve its problems, it was always thwarted by a money-based reason. While the author enjoys a decent standard of living, there appears to be no guaranteeing that even if he manages to put his children through college, that they will have much of a chance to enjoy a reasonable lifestyle. When a parent senses that his best efforts are not going to result in a reasonably happy lifestyle for his child, he becomes motivated to try something to improve the situation.

On a more global scale, it is depressing to read the newspaper and watch television news programs that endlessly detail the horrors that modern society can inflict on itself. Many wish that they could do something to help, but in today’s world, the only way to solve a problem is to devote large amounts of funds to them. As the author does not have large sums of money, this is an attempt to begin thinking about an idea that never seems to even be considered - let all of society determine in a cooperative manner how finite resources are to be allocated.

Goals
In order to continue to thrive as a species, man must ensure that the generations that succeed him have as good or better a chance to thrive and survive than he does. In the United States, despite incredible wealth on the part of some individuals, and a standard of living enjoyed by most that is the envy of the rest of the world, there are still intractable problems. While those who currently enjoy a high standard of living would resist change, claiming survival of the fittest, they may not realize that that theory sometimes leads to the extinction of a species. If resource allocation continues to polarize the way it has in the United States, can the possibility of extinction of our species through catastrophic war be entirely ruled out?

This admittedly is a far-fetched scenario for the United States, where a very stable political system does not encourage armed revolution. However, as oppression of certain classes in society gets worse, society should begin to plan NOW to make a change that will occur after the majority of the people making the decision will have passed on. Make a change that will reverse oppression, and allow everyone to lead a dignified life full of potential to achieve.

One of the most accepted paradigms of the United States culture is that a capitalistic society will provide the maximum opportunities to the majority of the people. As more people (especially children) slip into poverty every year, it is apparent that this is not true. The system that is being proposed continues to allow private property, but in proportion to one’s needs, not they’re excessive desires. An athlete or entertainer would no longer be paid a king’s ransom, but would be more in line with just with an upper class citizen.

The proposed system would give all people the dignity of not having to worry about where their next meal is coming from, or where they are going to sleep that night. It would guarantee everyone healthcare, which is a goal that many presidents have worked on, but have not been able to achieve. It would encourage new communities, away from overcrowded cities, that could become self-sufficient with manufacturing brought home from overseas. This could become the second industrial revolution, as the first had the charm of benefiting predominantly American workers. It seems that people talk about creating jobs do not realize that the United States will never be able to compete for manufacturing jobs with countries that pay masses of people starvation (by American standards) wages. Manufacturing is the engine that drives a society towards maximum productivity (witness the World War II build-up) and prosperity; its return is something that should be pursued and encouraged.

Crime is directly related to a person’s lack of self-esteem, living conditions, and sense of opportunity. The current society does not provide a reasonable chance for many successive generations to ever attain any substantial increase in their life style. If a person is made to feel a contributing member of society, instead of shunned, he will have the motivation to stay out of trouble. On a more practical level, if he can walk into any store and get most of what he needs, there is no need to take something from someone else. The absence of paper or any other form of money will reduce the incidence of armed robbery, counterfeiting, and other impulse crimes that revolve around greed and desperation.

The ultimate goal of reordering in this manner is to allow a complex society, which is constantly undergoing massive technological changes, a chance to fully involve all of its members. To give society a means to stabilize its families, which are now often torn apart for monetary reasons. To turn businesses from their current profit at all costs mentality to a more mutually beneficial mode. And to allow the government to do what it was created for, that is, to provide for the security and well being of its citizens.

The founding fathers established a system of government a long time ago that has allowed the United States to flourish. Though they were wealthy men themselves, they created a system that created freedom and rights for most of the citizens, and what they thought to be unlimited opportunity. They probably would not be pleased to see how some have benefited unreasonably at expense of others, and that men of means have the wherewithal to ensure that these conditions will never change. Would they not now perhaps agree to a change that would be radical, but not much more so than the one that they put forth?

This proposal is to give a chance to all people, regardless of sex, age, race, nationality, sexual preference, or religion in the United States to participate fully in the wonderful life that can be provided by an advanced society. By serious consideration of this proposal, and use of the existing system of government, first to enact the change, and then to become the conduit through which the resources will pass, society can become the land where the pursuit of happiness becomes reality. As the founding fathers intended, and God would bless.

Therein lies my proposal for reordering society along a Utopian model. I feel that that these thoughts should become mainstream once again, as they occasionally when a particularly influential book or community has sprung up. By endorsing a serious candidate to carry the banner for Utopians everywhere, the word may start to spread amongst the people who will matter the most if anything is ever going to change, the underprivileged. It is they who will be able to affect change by the sheer mass of their numbers, and by their desire to improve their condition. They have to be told that there is another way to a better life, but that all will have to sacrifice in order to achieve it. If Utopians are ever to be taken seriously, they have to use the most popular means of communication available in today’s society to prepare people to start thinking about their children’s futures. Unfortunately, one of the most universal means of group thought in the United States today is the "reality" show, of which the afore mentioned "American President" is one of the more serious examples. Utopians should not miss this opportunity to get the word out! Lets find a candidate, and get him on that show!

About the Author:
James Concannon is a federal government employee who lives and writes near Philadelphia, PA. He is a graduate of Temple University Business school, and hold's a Master's degree from Central Michigan University. This essay is the basis for a novel which he is currently attempting to get published. He can be reached by email at jimboc60@hotmail.com.

ll contents copyright ©  World Future Society, 2002.
All rights reserved.