Politics and Technology - Lead by Example? Not in Washington, DC
The single largest carbon emitter in the capital city of the United States is the Capitol Power Plant located a scant 3.2 kilometers (2 miles) from the White House. The energy this plant generates heats and cools the 23 buildings operated by the federal government including the Capitol, Library of Congress, congressional office buildings and the Supreme Court. And what does Capital Power use as a fuel? - coal.
The reason it does has nothing to do with accessibility to other fuel sources. It is the coal lobby in Congress and the Senate that has instituted this practice even though numerous plans have been proposed to convert the plant to natural gas.
The plant began operations in 1910. Its output provides steam and chilled water, not electricity. The Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) which has been established to monitor the Clean Air Act, is not involved at this time in looking at Capitol Power's output. So the plant continues to spew significant amounts of nitrous dioxide, sulphur dioxide and ozone in addition to CO2 into the air of Washington, DC.
A proposal has been made by the EPA to begin the process of establishing PAL levels at Capital Power. PAL stands for Plantwide Applicability Limit, an agreed to emissions allowance looking at all sources of pollutants. But that means measuring baseline actual emissions for an extended period of time to create the PAL.
Congress remains indifferent to the plant and its impact on the District of Columbia. No money has been allocated to overhaul the plant. No ban on using coal. Just total lack of interest.
What a wonderful example for the United States and what a statement about the federal government's commitment to address CO2, air pollution and the implications for climate change.
I'm not an American and this has me seething. Why isn't raising red flags in congressional districts across the entire country? And why aren't the people who live in Washington, DC, up in arms about such an abdication of responsibility by those in Congress who are breathing the same air?
- About WFS
- Contact Us
- Frequently Asked Questions
- History of WFS
- Board and Council
- Press Room
- Futurist Gear
- Are You the Next CEO of the World Future Society?
- Book a WFS / Futurist Magazine Speaker
Essays and comments posted in World Future Society and THE FUTURIST magazine blog portion of this site are the intellectual property of the authors, who retain full responsibility for and rights to their content. For permission to publish, distribute copies, use excerpts, etc., please contact the author. The opinions expressed are those of the author. The World Future Society takes no stand on what the future will or should be like.
Free Email Newsletter
Sign up for Futurist Update, our free monthly email newsletter. Just type your email into the box below and click subscribe.
Best Predictions of the Year (and the Worst)
In the last issue of THE FUTURIST, the annual Outlook report offered a roundup of the year’s best forecasts appearing in our magazine. In this issue, we see what nonfuturists had to say about the future during 2013.
Two Mars' stories hit the headlines this week. The first talked about Mars in the past. The second talked about plans for Mars in the future.
Latest Findings from Curiosity on Mars
As many of you know, WorldFuture 2014: What If, our annual conference, will be held this July in Orlando, Florida. I'm the Conference Coordinator for WFS and I'll be putting out occasional announcements on this blog to keep you informed about the great things we're planning for this summer.
December 9, 2013 - In Part 2 of this posting discussing how climate change may impact Africa's rivers we look at the areas of the continent that are sub-Saharan. The rivers here, like the Nile are all precipitation fed. In this posting we will look at the present and future of the Congo, Zambezi, Limpopo, and Orange.
December 12, 2013 - A new study appearing in the open access journal, Earth System Dynamics, analyzes energy balance in the atmosphere and its i
December 9, 2013 - For the past few years when I am out and about young people often stop me to ask me the time. I look at my battery-powered wristwatch and tell them. What I wonder about is what happened to the day when everybody wore a watch?
December 8, 2013 - How do you measure the downside of unburnable carbon assets against the balance sheets of energy companies? Enter the Bloomberg Carbon Risk Valuation Tool (CRVT), from Bloomberg Professional Service at XLTP XCO2.
This week I received two detailed reports from 23andMe (23andMe.com), the genomic organization I wrote about in an earlier blog. They sent a LOT of information, and I am still working through. The first report was about strengths and weaknesses in my health plus information about how my body might respond to various medications. The second report related more to ancestry and genealogy.