The Internet of Things and Smartphones are Breaking the Internet

I have written several articles on network communications on this blog site as well as on other sites, describing its evolution from serial communications connecting two machines, to the precursor of the Internet, called ARPANET, connecting mainframes and LANs at universities in the 1970s, and finally the arrival of the Internet in the 1980s, connecting the rest of us and all our devices to each other. All these networks were designed to connect static remote devices, computers sitting on desks hooked up by serial Ethernet cables to wired communications networks that soon spanned the globe. But that doesn't describe the Internet of today, filled with smartphones, smart chips and billions of other communicating devices.
In 2006, a writer with the MIT Technology Review published an article entitled The Internet is Broken in which he described the incremental changes happening in Internet usage and the lack of response by network specialists to a growing number of problems. That same author this week posted a follow up article on the same subject arguing that the "creeping complexity" of the Internet in supporting mobile device technology will expose serious architectural and security problems unless something is done about it.
I'll give you an example of the kinds of issues that I face with my Internet usage today. In my home I have a desktop computer running Windows 7. I also have a five-year old laptop running Windows XP, an Android tablet, an Android smartphone, and a WiFi enabled eReader. My daughter has her Windows7 laptop, an Android tablet, an iPod and a semi-smartphone good for email and short messaging. My wife has a Windows XP netbook and an Android smartphone. Currently our televisions are hooked up to satellite so no Internet capability as of yet. But soon I think.
We are all connected to the Internet through a single DSL line that is also our home voice line. The DSL is plugged into a WiFi-enabled modem that serves the house and a range extender that pushes the WiFi out to the end of the backyard.
All this connectivity and yet when I send an email to my wife sitting at a desk a few feet away from me it has to go out to the Internet and then come back into the house to get to her inbox. That just seems dumb to me.
Some documents and images that can be opened on my smartphone cannot be opened on my wife's netbook but she can see them when she looks at the same attachment or document on her smartphone. And sometimes when I send an email from my smartphone through the Gmail application running on the device, I don't see the sent email in my Gmail sent box on my desktop right away because I'm sending my message through the mobile 3G phone network. But if I send that Gmail from my smartphone while in the house my phone uses its WiFi connectivity and the email appears right away in the sent box. It's even worse with my wife's smartphone and netbook often requiring her to shut the computer off and restart for the sent mail to appear. She doesn't use Gmail.
This latency issue where you have multiple communication protocols all using the same Internet pipe is a bottleneck and I can imagine as I along with so many other populate our houses with more smart devices just how congested communication through the Internet will become.
One organization that is engaging the issue is the National Science Foundation (NSF) which launched the Future Internet Architecture Project in the summer of 2010. In its introduction the NSF stated, "The continued success of the Internet.....is increasingly threatened by the ever-mounting sophistication of security attacks and by the lack of performance reliability of Internet services." The project highlighted the following challenges:
- The importance of supporting and protecting content through better architecture and naming conventions.
- Supporting communications between mobile devices rather than fixed end points to reflect the changing demographic of Internet usage.
- Dealing with the Cloud with applications and data storage migrating from devices to cloud computing data centres as content repositories.
- Ensuring that the architecture of the Internet supports content creation from any device, any service, any program, with flexibility to anticipate any new communication protocol coming down the pipe in the foreseeable future.
- Developing multiple connect capability to allow a single Internet device like a mobile phone to seamlessly work with different types of services simultaneously including WiFi to 3G, 4G, LTE and anything beyond.
- Building device-to-device technologies that provide data transfer shortcuts that bypass the need for an infrastructure of net servers, an important capability for countries in the Developing World.
Without addressing each of these challenges an Internet of 15 billion things forecasted in 2015, and 50 billion possibly a decade later, will suffer from interruptions in service and network breakdowns.
- About WFS
- Resources
- Interact
- Build
About 21st Century Tech
Len Rosen is futurist, writer, and researcher based in Toronto, Canada. Read more of his work at 21stcentech.com. Follow him at @lenrosen4.
Notice
Essays and comments posted in World Future Society and THE FUTURIST magazine blog portion of this site are the intellectual property of the authors, who retain full responsibility for and rights to their content. For permission to publish, distribute copies, use excerpts, etc., please contact the author. The opinions expressed are those of the author. The World Future Society takes no stand on what the future will or should be like.
Free Email Newsletter
Sign up for Futurist Update, our free monthly email newsletter. Just type your email into the box below and click subscribe.
Blogs
THE FUTURIST Magazine Releases Its Top 10 Forecasts for 2013 and Beyond (With Video)

Each year since 1985, the editors of THE FUTURIST have selected the most thought-provoking ideas and forecasts appearing in the magazine to go into our annual Outlook report. The forecasts are meant as conversation starters, not absolute predictions about the future. We hope that this report--covering developments in business and economics, demography, energy, the environment, health and medicine, resources, society and values, and technology--inspires you to tackle the challenges, and seize the opportunities, of the coming decade. Here are our top ten.
Why the Future Will Almost Certainly Be Better than the Present

Five hundred years ago there was no telephone. No telegraph, for that matter. There was only a postal system that took weeks to deliver a letter. Communication was only possible in any fluent manner between people living in the same neighborhood. And neighborhoods were smaller, too. There were no cars allowing us to travel great distances in the blink of an eye. So the world was a bunch of disjointed groups of individuals who evolved pretty much oblivious to what happened around them.
Headlines at 21st Century Tech for January 11, 2013

Welcome to our second weekly headlines for 2013. This week's stories include:
- A Science Rendezvous to Inspire the Next Generation
- Next Steps for the Mars One Project
- Feeding the Planet Would Be Easier if We Didn't Waste Half of What We Produce
Where is the future?

Like the road you can see ahead of you as you drive on a journey, I suggest the future is embedded in emerging, continuous space-time. Although you’re not there yet, you can see the road in front of you. In the rear-view mirror stretches the landscape of the past, the world you have been through and still remember.
Transparency 2013: Good and bad news about banking, guns, freedom and all that

“Bank secrecy is essentially eroding before our eyes,” says a recent NPR article. ”I think the combination of the fear factor that has kicked in for not only Americans with money offshore, countries that don’t want to be on the wrong side of this issue and the legislative weight of FATCA means that within three to five years it will be exceptionally difficult for any American to hide money in any financial institution.”
The Internet of Things and Smartphones are Breaking the Internet

I have written several articles on network communications on this blog site as well as on other sites, describing its e
BiFi, Biology, Engineering and Artifical Life

BiFi is to biology as WiFi is to computers. It's a technology being pioneered by researchers at Stanford University and other institutions, looking at bioengineering techniques for creating complex biological communities working together to accomplish specific tasks. In a sense every organ and every system of coordinated activity within our bodies runs as a BiFi network.




Like us on Facebook
Comments
Ninety nine problems...
... but this ain't one.
"All this connectivity and yet when I send an email to my wife sitting at a desk a few feet away from me it has to go out to the Internet and then come back into the house to get to her inbox. That just seems dumb to me."
While the issue you're highlighting is a genuine (albeit marginal and low-impact) concern, this is a terrible exemplar. If your wife is literally a few feet away, can you not just tell her what you need to tell her? If there's a file she needs to see, or to print off, can you not just call her over or print it off on her behalf? If she needs her own copy of the file, can it really not wait the handful of minutes it'll take to work its way through the pipes?
I'm reductio ad absurdaming deliberately, but I think the point stands: the problem you describe is rooted in an unwarranted dependency on technology in situations where it's simply not necessary -- and in the grand scale of things, I suspect that's a bigger issue than the need for regionalised and hyperlocal routing protocols to be bolted onto the top of the TCP/IP stack.
Sure, the IoT -- *if* it meets the extravagant promises being made for it in the sudden wave of boosterism it's going thru right now (hasn't even hit the Peak of Inflated Expectations yet on the Gartner Hype Cycle) -- will exacerbate existing routing problems, but my theory is that that will be one of the things that makes us realise that, actually, not every single thing will ever need or warrant its own IP address.
We've enough genuine social and technological problems to be going on with that worrying about the throughput issues of a hypothetical world where every atom has its own IP address seems daft, as the solution is so obvious: don't give every damned thing an IP address. Sure, lots of essential devices and systems would become easier to monitor and manage once wired into the IoT. But your fridge doesn't need to be able to tweet you about you being short of milk; that is not a comparable need to, say, a remote rural water mains valve reporting that it can't close fully.
Technology is best deployed *only* for those problems that can't be solved without it; that we've failed to realise that very simple truth is possibly the most profound problem we have as a global society right now.
Post new comment