Chemical Looping May Make Cleaner Coal-Fired Power Plants Possible
With coal the most abundant of fossil fuels on our planet the search for clean coal power continues. A new 25-Kilowatt facility at Ohio State University reported the results of a week-long test process that if scaled could dramatically reduce pollutants such as nitrogen oxides and CO2 from coal-fired power plants. The next step involves ramping up to a 1 Megawatt facility.
Today's power plants using coal as the primary fuel combine air and a coal powder to create the energy to drive steam turbines. The process pollutes. Scrubbers capture the particulate matter in the outflow gases but do not reduce the CO2 and nitrogen oxide enough to impact greenhouse gas emissions. The pilot plant developed by Ohio State, however, uses a process called chemical looping which doesn't expose the coal to air. Instead coal interacts with iron oxide producing CO2, iron and ferrous oxide in an artificial form called wustite (seen in an image below).
The burning of iron in air produces the energy that then gets converted into electricity. The process produces no nitrogen oxide, so no smog. And the chief byproduct of the process is pure CO2 which can be captured and sequestered.
Ohio State is also experimenting with a variation on this chemical looping process. This one involves gasifying the coal to create syngas, a combination of carbon monoxide (CO) and hydrogen. Iron oxide (rust) is introduced and reacts with the syngas to release oxygen and wustite. The oxygen combines with the CO to form CO2, and the hydrogen to form steam. The CO2 is streamed, captured and sequestered. The wustite then gets exposed to air and forms iron oxide (rust) and heat which then can be used to drive steam turbines. If the iron is exposed to steam it can separate out the hydrogen in the vapour and capture it as a fuel for fuel cells.
In another chemical looping test, calcium oxide from limestone is used to extract oxygen for use in burning coal. The process allows for the capture of pure CO2 while generating the energy needed to power steam turbines.
Although I have consistently ascribed oxymoron to the words "clean coal" it is encouraging to see that we may have answers that legitimately can allow us to continue to rely on coal as a primary energy source. Of course, that means retrofitting old coal powered plants or building new ones that used chemical looping technology. And it still doesn't resolve the issue that we will have to sequester the CO2 byproduct produced by these power plants. That means finding a way to permanently trap the CO2 either deep in the Earth's crust or in the deep ocean where it cannot emerge and further exacerbate the greenhouse effect.
Essays and comments posted in World Future Society and THE FUTURIST magazine blog portion of this site are the intellectual property of the authors, who retain full responsibility for and rights to their content. For permission to publish, distribute copies, use excerpts, etc., please contact the author. The opinions expressed are those of the author. The World Future Society takes no stand on what the future will or should be like.
Free Email Newsletter
To sign up for Futurist Update, our free monthly email newsletter, enter your email in the box below and click Save.
Every Government Official Should Read This: Choosing Between Economic Growth and Fighting Climate Change Is No Longer an Issue
In today's Financial Times, Pilita Clark has written an article titled "Growth and fighting global climate change not incompatible." Did you hear that? Economic growth, the creation of jobs, increased Gross National Product - you in government no longer have to concern yourselves that enacting climate change mitigation strategies is going to drive your country into depression or worse.
One of my readers shared the following infographic, titled NASA Spinning Off Since 1962. It highlights the inventions, discoveries and economic return on investment resulting from NASA. For every dollar invested by the government the American economy and other countries economies have seen $7 to $14 in new revenue, all from spinoffs and licensing arrangements. That amounts to in $17.6 billion current NASA dollars spent to an economic boost worth as much as $246.4 billion annually.
Think of human services as something you guide through collaborative Governances that share ideas and advances at the speed of networks. When we work together vendors will learn to design the products and services you want.
America appears to have reached the Singles' Singularity—and one of the reasons may be the proliferation of dating sites. According to the Bureau of Labor Statistics, 50.2% of the adult U.S. population are unmarried, up from 22% in 1950.
By 2050, we will have to invest in a new road network 25 million kilometers in length to keep up with human population growth and infrastructure requirements. This represents a 60% increase from 2010, with almost all of these new roads located in the developing world.
What’s the value of a human life?
For some of you this is a very disconcerting question because it attempts to put a dollar value on a person, something we value in far different ways.
The other day, I realized that years of systematic study of the future had turned me into what can only be defined as a "neo-progressionist."
We are less than 10 days away from the planned climate summit of 125 nations taking place in New York City on September 23rd. So I thought it would be useful to take a quick climate change snapshot, rating the efforts of individual nations. That made me wonder - how are nations being measured? What constitutes a success? Who leads the pack? Who is failing?