Canada's Government Puts Science Research on Fisheries and Oceans in the Dumpster
January 25, 2014 - In a cost-saving exercise more about balancing budgets than good science the Canadian government under its current Prime Minister, Stephen Harper, has been closing dozens of libraries run by Environment Canada and Canada's department of Fisheries and Oceans. The libraries have been shuttered with most closing by last fall, but few were aware that the closings would be followed by the dumping of so much of the legacy science archived in these facilities. Pictures like the one below started appearing in the newspaper showing dumpsters filled with books, journals and research papers, all thrown out by our federal government.
In one case a just refurbished library at St. Andrews Biological Station in New Brunswick, housing hundreds of fisheries and aquatic records including fish counts and water quality analysis was closed and archival material sent to the rubbish heap.
These closures have saved the government a whopping $443,000. This is a government that has spent billions on cost overruns for defense projects but nonetheless found its savings in a science library.
So is Canada losing its legacy science? When confronted with the dumpster evidence, the Minister of Fisheries for the federal government stated that few people outside the department used these libraries and that most people were seeking data online. The Minister stated further that much of the information was to be digitized and made freely accessible and that it was only the irrelevant material that was being discarded. Who defined relevance? That was not disclosed. Yet in some cases conference proceedings were disposed of even though the notes and presentations created for these events appeared in no formal publications. In one case an aboriginal band in British Columbia rescued some of the material being thrown away. Hopefully others have stepped forward to grab more of this legacy science before trashing.
An assault on science is consistent with the policies of the current federal government in Canada. The government has been accused of muzzling scientists serving on the federal payroll.
Is this a trend happening elsewhere? Certainly the new federal government in Australia is likely to exhibit similar behaviour towards the scientific community within its ranks. Shortly after being elected it shut down funding to climate science with a crowdfunding initiative by the Australian public rescuing the program and turning it into a NGO.
It is interesting that both federal governments, the one in Canada and the other in Australia, are conservative and both dispute climate change science or drag their feet about initiating greenhouse gas emission mitigation strategies.
Related articles across the web
Essays and comments posted in World Future Society and THE FUTURIST magazine blog portion of this site are the intellectual property of the authors, who retain full responsibility for and rights to their content. For permission to publish, distribute copies, use excerpts, etc., please contact the author. The opinions expressed are those of the author. The World Future Society takes no stand on what the future will or should be like.
Free Email Newsletter
To sign up for Futurist Update, our free monthly email newsletter, enter your email in the box below and click Save.
Without the ocean Earth would be a pretty inhospitable place even though we lie within our Sun's Goldilocks Zone. Those of you who live by the ocean can probably figure out why that is the case. You see the ocean is a temperature moderator and a heat transport mechanism that evens out the climate across the planet.
The horror of 298 lives snuffed out by a missile is reverberating around the planet this week after last Thursday's downing of a Malaysian Airlines Boeing 777. How could missile technology meant to shoot down warplanes get used to destroy a civilian aircraft?
I remain skeptical about the economics of industrial technologies for carbon capture. Almost every project started has been heavily subsidized by government. But for the operators without government subsidy there seems to be no return on investment. First of all, all existing industrial carbon capture technologies are expensive to implement.
On a recent driving trip, my wife and I became immersed in the audio version of one of Tom Clancy’s last novels, titled “Threat Vector.” Without giving away too much of the plot, a Chinese super-geek villain has hatched a plan to hack into our most secure networks and blackmail people with their darkest secrets to subversively cause chaos and disruption for the American government.
If you work for the post office these days then you already have an inkling of what the 21st century will do to many jobs. Texting, email, and mobile connectivity have forever altered the way we communicate. How many of us still write letters on paper and mail them?
Some of you who know me personally know that in my formative years I started studying geophysics in university before a physical accident laid me up for more than a year and I in an epiphany changed my major to Islamic Studies and Medieval History. So I was both a science and history nerd all at the same time. Well nothing has changed.
The government in South Korea is organizing its manufacturing sector along with academics and ministries to tackle and develop 3D printing as an economic opportunity. Rather than rely on the hits and misses of free enterprise, the South Korean leadership is directing all interested players within the country to come up with a roadmap that will lead to innovation in manufacturing and the creation of new jobs.
Edward Cornish has served as the World Future Society’s lead visionary, founder, first President (1966-2004), and Editor of THE FUTURIST magazine (1967-2010). Since stepping away from daily editorial management, he has remained on the WFS Board and has been our Futurist in Residence, contributing book reviews and essays on “Futurists and Their Ideas.” And he’s come to the office faithfully every day.