Canada's Government Puts Science Research on Fisheries and Oceans in the Dumpster
January 25, 2014 - In a cost-saving exercise more about balancing budgets than good science the Canadian government under its current Prime Minister, Stephen Harper, has been closing dozens of libraries run by Environment Canada and Canada's department of Fisheries and Oceans. The libraries have been shuttered with most closing by last fall, but few were aware that the closings would be followed by the dumping of so much of the legacy science archived in these facilities. Pictures like the one below started appearing in the newspaper showing dumpsters filled with books, journals and research papers, all thrown out by our federal government.
In one case a just refurbished library at St. Andrews Biological Station in New Brunswick, housing hundreds of fisheries and aquatic records including fish counts and water quality analysis was closed and archival material sent to the rubbish heap.
These closures have saved the government a whopping $443,000. This is a government that has spent billions on cost overruns for defense projects but nonetheless found its savings in a science library.
So is Canada losing its legacy science? When confronted with the dumpster evidence, the Minister of Fisheries for the federal government stated that few people outside the department used these libraries and that most people were seeking data online. The Minister stated further that much of the information was to be digitized and made freely accessible and that it was only the irrelevant material that was being discarded. Who defined relevance? That was not disclosed. Yet in some cases conference proceedings were disposed of even though the notes and presentations created for these events appeared in no formal publications. In one case an aboriginal band in British Columbia rescued some of the material being thrown away. Hopefully others have stepped forward to grab more of this legacy science before trashing.
An assault on science is consistent with the policies of the current federal government in Canada. The government has been accused of muzzling scientists serving on the federal payroll.
Is this a trend happening elsewhere? Certainly the new federal government in Australia is likely to exhibit similar behaviour towards the scientific community within its ranks. Shortly after being elected it shut down funding to climate science with a crowdfunding initiative by the Australian public rescuing the program and turning it into a NGO.
It is interesting that both federal governments, the one in Canada and the other in Australia, are conservative and both dispute climate change science or drag their feet about initiating greenhouse gas emission mitigation strategies.
Related articles across the web
Essays and comments posted in World Future Society and THE FUTURIST magazine blog portion of this site are the intellectual property of the authors, who retain full responsibility for and rights to their content. For permission to publish, distribute copies, use excerpts, etc., please contact the author. The opinions expressed are those of the author. The World Future Society takes no stand on what the future will or should be like.
Free Email Newsletter
To sign up for Futurist Update, our free monthly email newsletter, enter your email in the box below and click Save.
Canadian Provincial Premiers Decide on a National Energy Strategy that Includes Climate Change Action
August 30, 2014 - In a rare display of unanimity Canada's provincial leaders at their annual conference have outlined a national energy strategy.
Do you control your screens or do they control you? Advertisers dive into your brain for free (to you) from the minute you begin to gurgle. In tomorrow’s digital world you’ll decide and filter what’s on your screens. One control will be a personal paywall so you can be paid for your attention. When this makes your mind into your property, you will be able to sell it as often as you like.
August 29, 2014 - It is an inspiration to see the technological marvels that have gotten us to where we are today. And a great place to see this is Chicago's Museum of Science and Industry.
While away on vacation, I read about LiftPort Group, a Kickstarter-funded space elevator project that received over $110,000 U.S. from more than 3,400 backers. The company, located in Tacoma, Washington, originally sought $8,000, so one would think this was largely fantasy, but with the amount of money that has come in it would seem it owes its investors something more than one it has delivered to-date.
Today, many voice long-familiar concerns about technological unemployment, where computers, robots, and machines are automating our jobs out of existence. In fact, some have gone so far as to call this the “robot jobs Armageddon.” So is this time truly different? Here are six overarching shifts in the world that are causing many to say, “Yes, this time may really be different!”
Self driving cars, 3D printing, robotics, these are just a few of the major technologies that are likely to bring massive disruptions in about every aspect of life. What do we eat? What would our work be like in the future? How do we travel? Where does our energy come from? The Council for the Environment and Infrastructure, the primary strategic advisory board for the Dutch government and parliament in matters relating to the physical environment and infrastructure, has initiated a foresight study to stimulate the public debate about the impact of disruptive technologies. It is not a traditional research project, but includes future imagery, crowd sourcing and technology assessment.