Bred to Resist Insect Pests GMO Crops Cause Less Damage to Biodiversity than Non-GMO

Len Rosen's picture

For those who think that GMO equals "Franken" crops and the introduction of transgenic plants that will ultimately destroy our biodiversity, think again. It turns out according to a study recently reported in the Journal Nature that cotton containing a crystal-like protein labelled Bt, short for Bacillus thuringiensis, has been planted in small plots in China and studied over two decades. Bt crystal proteins a subject which I have written about before, are poisonous to insects. They have been in use for more than 60 years and are considered safe for non-target organisms and for human and animal consumption. But Bt insecticides have a short shelf life and need to be constantly applied to fields to have a longer-term impact on insect pests.

When Bt crystal proteins were implanted into corn and cotton, these altered plants retained the toxicity of the crystal proteins throughout the growing cycle and bollworms that tried to eat the cotton died. Compared to non-Bt crops today's farmers of the latter have to apply insecticide as much as 15 times each growing season. But those planting Bt Cotton find themselves using 60% less pesticide in their fields. This allows spiders, ladybugs, lacewings and other beneficial insect predators to be unaffected. Ladybugs and lacewings are particularly valued because they eat the cotton aphid. So by incorporating GMO crops farmers use fewer chemicals and do less collateral damage to the environment.

Another interesting aspect of the Bt story relates to the type of agriculture practiced in China. Unlike North America, Chinese farm holdings are small and farmers plant conventional crops right next to fields growing Bt Cotton. This has given bollworms a refuge from exposure to Bt allowing them to continue the gene pool so that a Bt resistant strain of the insect has not yet evolved. This practice provides an interesting balancing act that we don't see here in North American farms which are much larger and tend to plant a single crop.



GMO crops

Science is a wonderful thing, and if it allows us to grow more food, how can we say no. The problem is we are turning our seeds over to a few companies, who will now determine the price, and who gets them. Thus in the name of science we are creating global monopolies on the most important product, food. Just as the "green revolution" ran into problems, who knows what the future will look like with GMO crops.

These days using limitation

These days using limitation of chemicals in farming sectors are increased surprisingly and resulting unnatural birth, heart problem and many other symptoms around the world. GMO crops seem to me have great potential for less chemical involving issue and I think by growing such crops we can actually save peoples suffering from various deadly diseases. Thanks.

Lisa Maddison

Plant breeding techniques

Through classical plant breeding techniques, present day cultivated crops have become significantly different from their wild counterparts. Many of these crops were originally less productive and at times unsuitable for human consumption. Over the years traditional plant breeding and selection of these crops have resulted in plants that are more productive and nutritious.

Subscribe to Futurist Update List