We know that the possibilities of our smart phones are virtually endless. One of the functions that we will see more and more are mobile payment services. Digital wallets are potentially everywhere. But would we, society as a whole, be willing to give up physical money completely?
Google Wallet, Paypal, ISIS (a consortium of telecom operators) and many more are experimenting with new modes of mobile contactless payment. There are developing all sorts of apps, trying new technology, working with banks and stores and run trials on the consumer market. Developments are very exciting. Mobile phones are at the center of payments, retail, advertising and social networks. And they create a rich source of consumer data. A true goldmine for most companies! So, it is not a surprise that so many players envy a stake in this market.
Mobile payment is buzzing in the air and there are wonderful opportunities. It fits perfectly with the new entrepeneurship of the 'gig economy', where all sorts of people start to share and sell home made products and services. But like always, there are also many hurdles. Technology is one thing that needs further investment. More intriguing is the fact that it brings payment into the hands of companies other than banks. The regulatory organizations have to develop new arrangements to ensure security adequately. It gives services providers an extremely rich source of data of people. In addition to everything you can learn from people by their activities online, their spending habits offline, income situation could also become transparent to these service providers. Who owns all that data?
However when the main security issues are solved, consumers will probably appreciate the convenience of mobile wallets. That is a big promise, and may explain for the proliferation of mobile wallet initiatives. And with many players on the market, consumers may have a lot options to choose their prefered service provider. But will they jump onboard that easily? And will all the merchants be convinced of the investment, when other electronic payment systems are operational in almost every store. It is not just a new technology and an interesting app that we are talking about. It is a systemic change, where customers, merchants, banks, regulators and many more have a say.
Meanwhile, traditional money won’t get lost. Hard coins are considered proven technology that has been around for ages. It is effective in all the unofficial economies that are also here to stay. That is, paying the babysitter, cleaning lady and handyman. Real money doesn’t leave digital traces. Sometimes that has a very profound function too.
Image: Mobile payment teminal, in Norway
Photo credits H Lundgard
Read more from us at Futurista blog
Essays and comments posted in World Future Society and THE FUTURIST magazine blog portion of this site are the intellectual property of the authors, who retain full responsibility for and rights to their content. For permission to publish, distribute copies, use excerpts, etc., please contact the author. The opinions expressed are those of the author. The World Future Society takes no stand on what the future will or should be like.
Free Email Newsletter
To sign up for Futurist Update, our free monthly email newsletter, enter your email in the box below and click Save.
The investment doesn't amount to a lot of dollars, a mere $1 billion, a drop in the bucket compared to the hundreds of billions and trillions that are the numbers associated with the fossil fuel industry, but New York State is on a path to increase solar capacity by 68%. This amounts to 214 Megawatts of new installations.
Energy storage prices are dropping fast. If you follow me, you’ve seen me write about this before. Energy storage prices have in fact been dropping exponentially for at least 25 years. Here’s a new piece of analysis – a model that uses a 20% learning curve per doubling to that project Li-ion batteries dropping to 5 cents per kwh round-tripped through them by ~2030.
The beleaguered nuclear power industry may soon have a good story to tell post-Fukushima. Lightbridge, a nuclear engineering company based in Virginia, is about to test a literal "twist" for fuel rods that can increase power yield by 10% in existing nuclear power plants with only minor modifications. And if the plants replace existing turbines with larger ones it would mean as much as a 17% increase in power output and incurring only an incremental investment without a major build.
The carbon capture and storage project at the Boundary Dam in Saskatchewan is about to go live as reported in the press today. The project goal has been to eliminate 90% of the CO2 generated by the coal-fired power plant. Additions have cost $1.4 billion CDN, $115 million over budget, and represent what is believed to be the world's first commercial-scale CCS project to go live.
I occasionally do talks on future TV and I generally ignore current companies and their recent developments because people can read about them anywhere. If it is already out there, it isn’t the future.
Surely gardens are a place to get back to nature, to escape from technology? Well, when journalists ask to see really advanced technology, I take them to the garden. Humans still have a long way to go to catch up with what nature does all the time.
Cool is a concept that people understand instinctively and globally. It is not Carl Rohde who decides on his own what it the cool stuff on any subject; his eyes and ears are his students and associates. Rohde teaches on (almost) all continents. Part of his assignment is take photographs, describe what it is, and why it is cool. Select the best cool hunt of the week, and upload it to the cool hunting platform. The cool hunters rate each other's works. The items that have most potential will show up. The network of associates does pretty much the same thing, but there everyone has his own specialty.
In a recent issue of Globe and Mail, Canada's purported national newspaper, Janet McFarland wrote a piece on ethical investment describing the Montreal Carbon Pledge and the commitment being made by global funds to report the carbon pollution within their portfolios. Portfolio screening focused on environmental issues is a relatively new practice for fund managers. Carbon represents just one in a number of the risks being assessed. Water, land use, pollution, and waste are also measured against portfolios and policy decision making.